Research and pilot fit
Bring a setting that can produce useful evidence.
Research and pilot proposals begin with a structured review of the setting, the evidence access, the decision authority and the outcome that could be acted on.
Pilot partners can contribute a controlled setting to a governance methodology while it is being developed. Proposals are reviewed by the founder against the evidence, authority and validation conditions required for meaningful work.
NOMAMIND reviews a limited number of research and pilot proposals individually. Submission is not an open invitation to a call or a guarantee of participation. Each proposal is assessed against the criteria below before a decision to proceed.
NOMAMIND prioritizes settings that can support controlled evidence, meaningful longitudinal access, replication or a real decision pathway. There are no unscheduled introductory calls. A strong submission makes the proposed setting and the accountable decision owner clear.
Before you submit: Your answers, professional contact details and technical submission information are stored in the NOMAMIND WordPress environment and used only to review the proposed research or pilot setting and decide whether to respond. They are not used to train AI systems or create Personality ASPECTS profiles. Read the Privacy Notice.